How to review a software-generated legal draft
How to review a software-generated legal draft. A practical guide for legal teams to prepare source documents, preserve context, and review work with professional judgment.
Review facts before style
Compare names, dates, amounts, and assertions to the supplied sources. Separate factual corrections from drafting preferences.
Make the input reviewable.
Preserve original source documents. Name files consistently and note which versions control. Provide a concise instruction describing the desired work product, intended reader, and limits. Record missing information as a question rather than asking for a guess.
A practical example.
A polished chronology can still reverse two dates. Trace each material event back to the original file before approving it.
Review in two passes.
First check the substance: source references, dates, names, amounts, and factual uncertainty. Then assess structure, readability, formatting, and completeness. Keep changes to the draft separate from changes to the underlying record.
Keep an approval trail.
Identify the reviewer and retain the approved version alongside the source inventory. If further processing is needed, approve the new credit quote. Manual editing and repeat downloads of completed outputs do not consume additional credits.
Know the limits.
These are document-management suggestions for legal professionals, not individualized legal advice or procedural instructions. Independently verify authorities, court requirements, and jurisdiction-specific obligations. A well-organized packet does not establish legal correctness.
Keep reading.
A clearer path from files to first draft.
Free team accounts. Shared firm credits. Professional judgment at every step.